Question

Difference between non-alignment movement and neutrality

Answer 1

Neutral' is a general term for a country's policies. The Non-Aligned Movement is a specific organisation founded in 1961, with a conference and a membership list. The idea of non-alignment was coined during the Cold War as a specific form of neutrality.

Answer 2

Difference between non-alignment movement and neutrality:

Neutrality

• Neutral' is a broad term for such a country's policies.

• As such, a neutral state must normally pay particular attention to a strictly equal foreign policy it must avoid making anybody an enemy.

• But it also avoid becoming too friendly with any country at the expense of others.

• The downside is that, when attacked, a neutral country normally cannot rely on someone else to stand up for it.

• Austria , Costa Rica , Ireland ,Japan  etc are comes under neutrality countries.

Non-alignment movement

• The Non-Aligned Movement is an 'international formal group' with congress and membership register, founded in 1961.

• The Non-Aligned Movement has also positioned itself as an international movement calling for general disarmament and peace, 'regional development', debt reduction, and 'anti-colonialism'.

• The idea of non-alignment was coined during the Cold War as a specific form of neutrality.

• We stop joining any agreements or deals that might otherwise participate in battle on behalf of others to support this strategy.

• African country except South Sudan and Western Sahara is a member of the Non-Aligned Movement.

Learn more about non-alignment movement

What is Non alignment Movement

https://brainly.in/question/7822002

Non-alignment was necessary during the Cold War. Give your opinion on the topic.

https://brainly.in/question/4563772