Difference between non-cooperation and civil disobedience movement?
Answers
Answered by
16
Well, these are two 'tools', based on non-violence, used by Gandhiji during India's freedom struggle. As per Dr. Jyotsna Kamat , ' The "Non Cooperation Movement" (a.k.a. "Asahakar") in 1920's included surrender of titles, resignation from nominated seats in local government bodies, boycott of government educational institutions, law courts and foreign goods. Swadeshi also was included later.
But, 'The civil disobedience was organized against repressive laws. Gandhi, supported by Congress had started the agitation for reduction in land revenue, abolition of salt tax, cutting down military expenditure and levying duty on foreign cloth etc. But the British Government did not agree. They thought these were ' populist' schemes to win over different sections of the society.'
But, 'The civil disobedience was organized against repressive laws. Gandhi, supported by Congress had started the agitation for reduction in land revenue, abolition of salt tax, cutting down military expenditure and levying duty on foreign cloth etc. But the British Government did not agree. They thought these were ' populist' schemes to win over different sections of the society.'
Answered by
6
I hope it will help you. . . .
Though the two terms Non-cooperation and civil obedience appear to be similar in their meanings, there is a number of difference between these two terms. Non-cooperation and Civil disobedience operated as movements in the history, in a number of countries. When examining the history of India, both movements can be identified. However, the implementation of these two criterion bear evidence that there exists observable difference. First it is necessary to define the two terms. Noncooperation is the refusal to cooperate with the government of a country whereas Civil disobedience refers to the refusal to obey certain laws of a country. Despite the fact that the definitions sound similar, the difference lies in noncooperation being rather passive in comparison to civil disobedience that plays an active role. This article attempts to highlight the difference between the two while examining the two terms.
if it will help you than mark it as branlist please. ......
Though the two terms Non-cooperation and civil obedience appear to be similar in their meanings, there is a number of difference between these two terms. Non-cooperation and Civil disobedience operated as movements in the history, in a number of countries. When examining the history of India, both movements can be identified. However, the implementation of these two criterion bear evidence that there exists observable difference. First it is necessary to define the two terms. Noncooperation is the refusal to cooperate with the government of a country whereas Civil disobedience refers to the refusal to obey certain laws of a country. Despite the fact that the definitions sound similar, the difference lies in noncooperation being rather passive in comparison to civil disobedience that plays an active role. This article attempts to highlight the difference between the two while examining the two terms.
if it will help you than mark it as branlist please. ......
Similar questions