Difference between Spiritualism and Materialism theme in a Horse and two goats
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
this foreigner is not so much a heavenly messiah as a symbol of materialism, capitalism, and neocolonialism. The foreigner’s attempts to assign a price to anything and his assumption that Muni owns the statue on which he sits “like other souvenir-sellers in this country presiding over their wares” is not only condescending, but grotesquely materialistic. This materialism and obsession with the concept of “time as money” (he offers to buy the statue because he doesn’t “want to seem to have stopped here for nothing”) blind the foreigner to the significance and meaning of the statue. Thus, the true value and meaning of the statue—and the traditions behind it—are obscured by materialism. Ultimately, Narayan presents a vision of the world much like the world of the Kali Yuga—in which striving for material possessions has blinded people to the value of spirituality.
Answer:
Both Muni and the Red-Faced Foreigner struggle with preoccupations over possessing material objects. The foreigner struggles more with materialism as he is more prosperous and thus has more possessions than Muni, but this preoccupation figures, albeit to a lesser extent, in Muni’s life as well. Unlike the foreigner, however, Muni revels in recounting his past and in discussing his spirituality in the form of mythological tales, which is shown to be at odds with the foreigner’s obsession with material objects and financial matters. The foreigner is thus emblematic of the time- and money-obsessed capitalist society of which he is a part. These petty preoccupations prevent the foreigner from appreciating Muni’s spiritual narrative—not only because of the language barrier, Narayan suggests, but because of their differing cultural perspectives. In this story, Narayan presents materialism and a preoccupation with ownership as obstacles to engaging with the spiritual dimension of life.
Explanation:
hope it helps you