History, asked by jambhulkarv80, 9 months ago

Difference between the pathshalas and missionary school of the British rule in India?​

Answers

Answered by hiranjanyadav70
9

Answer:

William Adam was a Scottish missionary. He toured the districts of Bengal and Bihar and prepared a report on vernacular schools in 1830s. According to his report, there were over 1 lakh pathshalas in Bengal and Bihar. These were smaller institutions; with each having no more than 20 students. But the total number of children studying in these pathshalas was a whopping 20 lakh. These pathshalas were set up by wealthy people or the local community or by a teacher.

The pathshalas followed a flexible system of education. There were no fixed fee, no printed book, no separate building, no benches or chairs, no system of separate classes, no rollcall registers, no regular examinations and no regular time-table. Classes could be held under a banyan tree, in a village shop or temple, or at the guru’s home.

Answered by jaithak
11

Answer:

palthshalas wre used to sit under the trees or corners of shops or temples and they don't have facilities

missionary school used to sit in building and have more facilities

Explanation:

mark it as brainliest answer ❤

Similar questions