difference between tiger in zoo and in forest
Answers
The difference between a tiger in a zoo and in a forest is huge as in the former it is a caged animal who has lost its freedom whilst in the latter it is independent and supreme.
Explanation:
The tiger is the king of the forest. It is born free. It roams about the forest roaring regally. It enjoys its supremacy as all animals are afraid of it. It is thus wildly royal. In the zoo however, it is a trapped animal. It is like a king in fetters, a king without a kingdom. It can no longer enjoy hunting. It is more like a circus clown-a sheer spectacle.
It is bound by the rules and regulations of the zoo-keeper. Lost is its suzerainty and dignity. It is just a puppet-king.
Answer:
The difference between a tiger in a zoo and in a forest is enormous, as in the former it is a caged animal that has lost its freedom, while in the latter it is independent and sovereign.
Explanation:
The tiger is the king of the forest. Born free. Roaring majestically, it roams through the forest. He enjoys his supremacy as all animals fear him. So it's absolutely real. At the zoo, however, he is a captive animal. It's like a king in chains, a king without a kingdom. You can no longer enjoy the hunt. It's more like a circus clown: pure spectacle. It is subject to the animal care regulations. Their sovereignty and dignity are lost. He's just a puppet king.
#SPJ2