Differences between
MODERN INDIAN ADMINISTRATION
AND
MAURYAN ADMINISTRATION.
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
The Maurya Empire was a geographically-extensive Iron Age historical power based in Magadha and founded by Chandragupta Maurya which dominated the Indian subcontinent between 322 and 187 BCE. Comprising the majority of South Asia, the Maurya Empire was centralized by the conquest of the Indo-Gangetic Plain, and its capital city was located at Pataliputra (modern Patna).[6][7] The empire was the largest political entity to have existed in the Indian subcontinent, spanning over 5 million square kilometres (1.9 million square miles) at its zenith under Ashoka[8].
Answer:
Explanation:
The Mauryan Adminisatration was different from the Modern Indian Administration in many ways. The Mauryan empire was run by a king, it was a kind of centralized rule, where Marchy revailed.
The modern Indian administration is a kind of a democratic, parliamentary setup, where it is the people who decide who stay in power.
The king is known as the dharmapravartaka in the Mauryan empire, whereas in Modern Indian parliamentary system, there are ministers who look into the affairs of the state and nation.