History, asked by shri4686, 11 months ago

differentiate between nationalistic history and colonial history​

Answers

Answered by ishitaaparajita73
0

thinly-veiled political agenda usually stands behind these claims. Most people nowadays agree that colonialism was bad. So if nationalism leads to colonialism, that's a mark against nationalism; but if nationalism leads to anti-colonialism, that's a mark in favor of nationalism.

Answered by aaridhikatiyar
0

Answer: Here is the difference between nationalism history and colonial history.

Explanation: Until the mid-1980s, the history of colonialism and nationalism in 20th century Korea was conceptualized, for the most part, as a struggle between two nations: a colonizing Japan that was racist, exploitative and non-modern, opposed by a resisting and enduring Korean nation. The Cold War system commanded by the United States accommodated this form of anti-colonial narrative and worked to marginalize alternative views: keeping North Korean and Japanese nationalist historiography beyond the realm of credibility and, like stealth technology, keeping the United States invisible in much of the discussions about colonialism in East Asia.

Hope it helps you !!

Similar questions