English, asked by 9312135697, 1 year ago

Differentiate between the practice of hunting as a sport in India after the forest act were passed

Answers

Answered by writersparadise
20

In India, after the forest act was passed people were not allowed to hunt for their customary right or for their livelihood but they were allowed to hunt as a sport during British rule. This hunting was allowed in the pretext that the wild animals were threat to the human society and certain forest areas were exclusively reserved for hunting.  Many animals have become extinct because of this.

Answered by arnavbhalgaonkar
6

Difference between the customary practice of hunting as a sport in India,

after the Forest Acts were passed:

i. Before the forest laws, many people who lived in or near forests had

survived by hunting deer, partridges and a variety of small

animals.This customary practice was prohibited by the forest laws.

ii. Those who were caught hunting were now punished for poaching.

While the forest laws deprived people of their customary rights to

hunt, hunting of big game became a sport. In India, hunting of tigers

and other animals had been part of the culture of the court and

nobility for centuries.

iii. Many Mughal paintings show princes and emperors enjoying a

hunt. But under colonial rule the scale of hunting increased to such

an extent that various species became almost extinct.

iv. The British saw large animals as signs of a wild, primitive and

savage society. They believed that by killing dangerous animals the

British would civilise India.

v. They gave rewards for the killing of tigers, wolves and other large

animals on the grounds that they posed a threat to cultivators. 0ver

80,000 tigers, 150,000 leopards and 200,000 wolves were killed for

reward in the period 1875-1925. Gradually, the tiger came to be

seen as a sporting trophy.

vi. The Maharaja of Sarguja alone shot 1,157 tigers and 2,000

leopards up to 1957. A British administrator, George Yule, killed 400

tigers. Initially certain areas of forests were reserved for hunting.

Only much later did environmentalists and conservators begin to

argue that all these species of animals needed to be protected, and

not killed.

Similar questions