Question

Direct democracy is not prevalent in the present scenario. Give Reason.

Answer 1

$\huge{\underline{\bf{\green{Answer:-}}}}$

Direct democracy is not

prevalent in the present

scenario. Give reason.

$\huge{\underline{\bf{\green{Answer:-}}}}$

Definition of Direct Democracy :-

Direct democracy, also called pure democracy, forms of direct participation of citizens in democratic decision making, in contrast to indirect or representative democracy.

Few reasons are Following:-

$\bigstar$ As direct democracy often requires nationwide votes and assemblies, its economic, social and political costs will be considerable. It may particularly give rise to an over-politicisation of society, resulting in the dominance of politics over everything else.

$\bigstar$ Direct democracy is indeed a zero-sum game, an instrument that aggravates social conflicts, it splits a society between majorities and minorities, and the minorities will find their positions, interests and rights suppressed.

$\bigstar$ Direct democracy tends to bring about unrest, intolerance and injustice.

Answer 2

Answer: Definition of Direct Democracy :-

Direct democracy, also called pure democracy, forms of direct participation of citizens in democratic decision making, in contrast to indirect or representative democracy.

Few reasons are Following:-

As direct democracy often requires nationwide votes and assemblies, its economic, social and political costs will be considerable. It may particularly give rise to an over-politicisation of society, resulting in the dominance of politics over everything else.

Direct democracy is indeed a zero-sum game, an instrument that aggravates social conflicts, it splits a society between majorities and minorities, and the minorities will find their positions, interests and rights suppressed.

Direct democracy tends to bring about unrest, intolerance and injustice.