disadvantage of moral science( 50 point on giving well answer)
Answers
Can science deal with morals and values?
Yes it can. But it will have to change in some very fundamental ways.
Let’s start by asking: What is morality? It can simply be defined as one’s duties and responsibilities. But defining our duty requires us to say that we exist in a role—-father, mother, son, employee, citizen, etc.
The problems are two-fold.
First, in modern science we accept the existence of objects but not of roles. The objects are actors but these actors don’t have specific relation to any other object: they always act universally in relation to all objects. Take the example of gravity. An object with mass exerts force uniformly on all objects. It doesn’t have specific relations to specific objects, and it doesn’t behave differently in these relations. So, factually, there is no role. Without a role, there is no responsibility, and without that there is no morality.
Second, we are simultaneously in many roles, but all those roles don’t act simultaneously. Thus, we sometimes prioritise our job over family and sometimes family over job.
Based on these two problems, there are two needs for science.
First, objects must not constantly interact with each other; only one interaction is possible at one time. This requirement is met in atomic theory (as opposed to classical physics) because an interaction is mediated by the emission of a particle, and only one particle is emitted at a time.
Second, when the particle is emitted, we should be able to classify this energy into many types: e.g. talking, holding, walking, etc. This requirement is not met even in atomic theory because the energy is simply energy, not a type of energy. Therefore you can only say that something is being done, but you can’t say what that is. If you cannot tell what is being done, then you cannot say if that is right or wrong.
So, for science to explain morality, the energy must have types. Can science do that? Yes and no. Types have always been rejected in modern science. It has been believed that these types have no natural basis, and they only exist in our minds. That has to change. We do acknowledge some types, such as kinetic, potential, thermal types of energies. But this is far from adequate. So given this problem of type rejection, morality cannot be understood in current science.
But given the above explanation of energy having infinite types—-not just quantity of energy—the solution is possible. Today, the quantum of energy only is a quantity of energy. But if the quantum also had types, then it will be possible.
As a final point, I have authored an interpretation of atomic theory in which many problems of the theory are solved by a type-based view of energy. I won’t advertise it here, but you are welcome to find it. Morality is one of the problems solved by it; there are other purely physics problems.
Answer:
Some disadvantages of moral education are that someone else decides what the moral education is. Therefore, it can't be adjusted to an individuals moral values. Another disadvantage of moral education might be that you can create guilt about things that might otherwise not be a big deal. Additionally, education also might not be tailored to the individual and we develop moral reasoning at different levels.
Explanation: