discuss drawbacks of Rutherford's model.
Answers
Answered by
5
Rutherford proposed that electrons revolve at a high speed in circular orbits around the positively charged nucleus. When a charged particle i. e. electron revolves around positively charge nucleus, it needs to be accelerated so as to keep it moving in circular orbits. However, according to electromagnetic theory, whenever a charged particle such as an electron is accelerated around another charged center ( nucleus ) which are under force of attraction, there will be continuous radiation of energy. This loss of energy would slow down the speed of the electron. This would reduce the radius of the electron–orbit. Eventually the electron would fall into the nucleus. The result would be that the atom would collapse. But this does not happen. Thus Rutherford’s atom could not explain the stability of the atom. Failure of Rutherford’s model i.e. reduction of radius of orbit is shown below.Rutherford proposed that electrons revolve around the nucleus in the fixed orbits. However, he did not specify the orbits and the number of electrons in each orbit.
please mark as brainliest
please mark as brainliest
shrutika000:
itna bada
Answered by
1
The comparison of electrons with planets in the solar system is the main drawback of Rutherford's atomic model. According to the classical laws of mechanics and electrodynamics, if an electrically charged particle is in motion, it inevitably radiates energy. Thus, an electron, when moving around the nucleus continually, should radiate energy, i.e. lose energy. As a result it should be gradually pulled towards the nucleus and end up colliding with it. However, we know that an atom is structurally stable.
Thus Rutherford model could not explain this stability.
Thus Rutherford model could not explain this stability.
Similar questions