History, asked by subhadeeppaul1836, 10 hours ago

Discuss how Brahmanical religion was biased towards women? Mention at least five points.​

Answers

Answered by jaibajaj6d
0

Answer:

o6zuzrzuuztzp6rprusxs46qsw4up86xe 69396e,

Answered by rochanaratakonda
3

Explanation:

This is a study of the Brahmanical discourse on women in ancient India between 500 b c e

and 300 CE. It specifically addresses the question of the representation of women in certain

Brahmanical texts which were composed, compiled and written down during this period.

The thesis attempts to move away from a previous focus on the ‘status of women’ in

ancient ‘Hindu’ India and from an uncritical acceptance of Brahmanical texts as reflective of

social reality. Instead, it argues that under certain historical circumstances Brahmanism

evolved a particular discourse on women. This discourse, subsequently expressed in its texts,

saw women in essentialist terms, as sexually insatiable and, therefore, sinful. At the same

time, however, Brahmanism recognized that women had a vital role to play in the

reproduction of its envisioned social order, particularly in the maintenance of caste and

lineage purity and the family (all three being important pillars of the Brahmanical social

order). Therefore, women had to be controlled. My reading of the Brahmanical texts suggests

that the method of control evolved by Brahmanism to deal with this apparent dilemma was

the classification of women according to their reproductive abilities, a classification which

served to distinguish the normative from the ‘deviant’ woman. In this scheme, the mother

was the procreatrix and as such was accorded the highest status. Woman as the mother thus

became the primary normative categoiy. Furthermore, with motherhood came qualitative

changes in a woman’s kin and sexual status. Woman as wife or daughter formed the

secondary normative category. She enjoyed the status of a potential procreatrix, being yet to

fulfil her primaiy biological function. As a wife and daughter, therefore, a woman held an

ambiguous kin position. She was regarded as sexually dangerous, which led to an emphasis

on the wife’s chastity and the daughter’s virginity. This thesis argues that since, according to

Brahmanism, a woman was defined by her reproductive abilities, one who was not (or could

not be) a mother was by definition ‘deviant’. This category included the widow, the woman

ascetic and the vesya, women whose potential for procreation was not recognized socially.

It has often been argued that Brahmanical texts objectify women and that a study of such

texts perpetuates both the objectification of women and their portrayal as the ‘other’.

Therefore, after discussing the Brahmanical discourse on women, the thesis addresses the

question of the agency of women in ancient India. While not totally agreeing with the current

ethnographic studies on the ‘subversive’ activities of women within the patriarchal order, in

its concluding section, this thesis examines questions relating to women’s complicity with

and resistance against Brahmanical norms and categorizations in ancient India.

Similar questions