discuss the arguments advanced in favour of the regional continuity model of human Origins.Do you think it provides a convincing explanation of the archaeological evidence? Give reasons for your answer.
Answers
Advanced arguments in favor of regional continuity model of Human rights:
The argument advanced in favor of the regional model of human origins is that archaic human being evolved at totally different rates in several regions into trendy humans.
That is why there was distinction within the unveiling of contemporary humans in varied elements of world. This argument is predicated on the regional variations within the characteristics of present day humans.
In step with the supporters of this argument, these dissimilarities area unit owing to the distinction between the pre-existing Homo heidelbergensis and Homo erectus populations that lived within the same region.
The accessible proof of the earliest fossils of contemporary humans type Omo in Ethiopia disproves the claims of regional continuity model."
According to the Regional Continuity Model, the Homo sapiens evolved in different regions at different rates into modern humans. So there was a variation in the first appearance of modern humans in different parts of the world. It was based on the regional differences in the features of present day humans. The advocates of this view found that the dissimilarities are due to the differences between the Homo erectus and Homo heidelbergensis populations of the same regions.
The Regional Continuity Model does not give a convincing explanation of the archaeological evidence.