Discuss the inter state relation in indian federation
Answers
Challenges before 1990 :
(a) Political scene was dominated by one party both at the centre and in the states.
(b) States which had government of political parties other than that at the centre were undermined and harassed by the centre even by using constitutional provisions.
After 1990 :
(a) Now the centre and majority of state governments belong to different political parties in coalition.
(b) A number of regional parties have become powerful and play a crucial role at the centre and states.
(c) The era of “coalition” government at the centre has inculcated respect for federal autonomy.
plzz mrk it brainliest
In India, before the formation of the federation the States were not ‘sovereign’ entities.
As such, there was no need for safeguards to protect ‘States’. On account of the exigencies of the situation, the Indian federation has acquired characteristics which are quite different from the American model.
(i) The residuary powers under the Indian Constitution are assigned to the Union and not to the States. However, it may be noted that the Canadian Constitution does the same mode of distributing the powers cannot be considered as eroding the federal nature of the Constitution.
(ii) Though there is a division of powers between the Union and the States, the Indian Constitution provides the Union with power to exercise control over the legislation as well as the administration of the States. Legislation by a State can be disallowed by the President, when reserved by the Governor for his consideration.
The Governor is appointed by the President of the Union and holds office “during his pleasure”. Again these ideas are found in the Canadian Constitution though not in the Constitution of the U.S.A.
(iii) The Constitution of India lays down the Constitution of the Union as well as the States, and no State, except Jammu and Kashmir, has a right to determine its own (State) Constitution.
(iv) When considering the amendment of the Constitution we find that except in a few specific matters affecting the federal structure, the States need not even be consulted in the matter of amendment of the Constitution. The bulk of the Constitution can be amended by a Bill in the Union Parliament being passed by a special majority.
(v) In the case of the Indian Constitution, while the Union is indestructible, the States are not. It is possible for the Union Parliament to reorganise the States or to alter their boundaries by a simple majority in the ordinary process of legislation.
The ‘consent’ of the State Legislature concerned is not required; the President has only to ‘ascertain’ the views of the Legislatures of the affected States. The ease with which the federal organisation may be reshaped by an ordinary legislation by the Union Parliament has been demonstrated by the enactment of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956. A large number of new States have, since, been formed.