discuss the legacy of nationalist movement in india
Answers
❤❤ HOLA ❤ ❤
Legacies of national movement in India:
The Indian national movement had a legacy of political and economic protest. This in turn became a legacy for the Independent India. In the latter half of the 19th century, the nationalist leaders like Dadabhai Naoroji, M.G. ... These were mainly Swaraj, political and economic rights, socialism, planning and consensus.
Answer:
Explanation:
The Indian Constitution reflect the legacy of the national movement for freedom. It laid emphasis on pluralism, secularism, opposition to all types of discrimination, provision of equal opportunities to all for self-development and many other similar concerns epitomize values that came to the forefront during the country's struggle for freedom against colonial rule.
The Indian freedom struggle was perhaps the greatest mass movement in world history. After 1919, it was built around the basic notion that the people had to, and could play an active role in politics and in their own liberation and it succeeded in politicizing and drawing into political action a large part of the Indian people. Satyagraha, as a form of struggle, was based on the active participation of the people and on the sympathy and support of the non-participating millions. It was basically due to political participation of millions of people that the nationalist leaders reposed their full faith in the political capacity of the masses. The Indian National Movement was fully committed to a polity based on representative democracy and the full range of civil liberties for the individual. From the very beginning, the movement popularized democratic ideas and institutions among the people and struggled for the introduction of parliamentary institutions on the basis of popular elections. The demand for universal adult franchise was also made and integral part. Civil liberties were further strengthened with the formation of Congress Ministries in 1937.
Since the foundation of Indian National Congress in 1885, it was organized on democratic lines. It relied upon discussion at all levels as the chief mode for the formation of its policies and arriving at political decisions. Congress did not insist on uniformity in viewpoints or policy approach within its ranks. It allowed dissent and not only tolerated but encouraged different and minority opinions to be openly held and freely expressed. In fact, dissent became a part of its style. The ideas of representative government, popular sovereignty and civil liberties were conceptualized due to freedom struggle. Colonial authorities had spread the notion that due to geographical, historical and socio-cultural reasons, India was unfit for democracy.
The Indian National movement developed a complex and sophisticated critique of the basic features of India’s colonial economy, especially of its subordination to the needs of the British economy. The vision of a self-reliant independent economy was developed and popularized. Self-reliance was defined not as autarky but as avoidance of subordinate position in the world economy. Nationalists, since the very beginning, with near unanimity, agreed on development of agriculture and industry on modern science and technology. They also emphasized the close link between industry and agriculture. Industrial development was seen as essential for rural development, for it alone could reduce population pressure on land and rural unemployment. Within industrialization, the emphasis was on the creation of an indigenous heavy capital goods or machine-making sector whose absence was seen as a cause of both economic dependence and underdevelopment. Simultaneously, for essential consumer goods the nationalists advocated reliance on medium, small-scale and cottage industries. These industries were to be encouraged and protected as a part of the development strategy of increasing employment.
The legacy of the national movement could be summarized as,
• a commitment to political and economic independence,
• modern economic development,
• the ending of inequality,
• oppression and domination in all forms,
• representative democracy and civil liberties,
• internationalism and independent foreign policy,
• promotion of the process of nation in the making on the basis of the joyous acceptance of the diversity, and
• achievement of all these objectives through accommodative politics and with the support of a large majority of the people.