discuss the main provisions of the 73 and 74 constitutions amendment and what are the limitations
Answers
Answer:
The state governments effectively enjoyed power in the holding of elections to local bodies. The 73rd and 74th amendments take away an option that the state government previously had though it chose not to exercise it. And in politics, as in finance, options have value even if not ultimately exercised.
Until the passage of the 73rd and 74th constitutional amendments, the states were the only sub- national units officially recognized by the Indian constitution. And the constitution grants individual states considerable legislative autonomy.
Schedule Seven of the Constitution explicitly demarcates the respective legislative domains of the state legislatures and the national parliament. The functional areas over which the national parliament has exclusive domain are specified in List I, also called the "Union List".
Items on this list include among other things, defense, foreign affairs, currency, income taxes, inter-state commerce, and key infrastructure. On the other hand, state legislatures have exclusive authority to enact legislation dealing with the items in List II, known as the "State List".
Included in this list are items such as law and order, public health, agriculture, wealth taxes, land tenure and land reforms, and most notably in the current context, functions of local governments.
List III, the "Concurrent List" includes items such as electricity, newspapers, education, price controls, etc., over which the national parliament and the state legislatures share jurisdiction.
The legislative origins of the 73rd and 74th constitutional amendments date back to the Constitution (64th Amendment) Bill, which was introduced in the parliament in July 1989. The introduction of this bill represented the first attempt to confer constitutional status on rural local governments.
Though the bill's broader aim of revitalizing rural local government was greeted favorably, some of the details were criticized and the bill was ultimately defeated in the Rajya Sabha. It is worth noting that the main criticism leveled against the bill was that it offered the states little discretion in the design of local government reforms.
The 73rd and 74th constitutional amendments were introduced in parliament in September, 1991 by the government of Prime Minister Narasimha Rao of the Congress(l) Party in the form of two separate bills: the 72nd Amendment Bill for rural local bodies (also known as Panchayats) and the 73rd Amendment Bill for municipalities.
They were referred to a Joint Select Committee of Parliament and were ultimately passed as the 73rd and 74th Amendment Bills in December, 1992. After the bills were ratified by the state assemblies of more than half the states, the President gave his assent on April 20, 1993.
The amendments were then officially enacted through the issuance of government notifications the Constitution (73rd Amendment) Act, 1992 (commonly referred to as the Panchayati Raj Act) went into effect on April 24, 1993, and the Constitution (74th Amendment) Act, 1992 (the Nagarpalika Act), on June 1, 1993.
With local governments being a state subject in Schedule Seven of the constitution, any legislation reforming the structure of local government has to; ultimately, be enacted at the state level. The first task of the states was therefore to pass conformity acts, which either introduced new legislation or amended existing legislation, to bring the state laws into line with the provisions of the amendment. Under the amendments, states had a year, from the date the amendment went into effect, to do so.
Because the amendments contain both mandatory and discretionary provisions, the degree of flexibility afforded the states in this task varied with the provision in question.
The distinction between mandatory and discretionary provisions is embodied in the specific language adopted in the Acts and carried over into the newly inserted articles of the Constitution.
The mandatory provisions were those that contain the word "shall" in referring to the steps that individual states needed to take.
In the discretionary provisions, on the other hand, the word "may" figures prominently. And so, while many of the discretionary provisions laid out a vision and created a space for individual states to legislatively innovate in reforming local government, ultimately, the design and scope of particular reforms was left to the discretion of individual state legislatures.
Of the mandatory provisions of the Panchayati Raj Act, the most critical are those that strengthen the structure of representative democracy and political representation at the local level.
The main provisions of the 73 and 74 constitutions:
- Parliament enacted some Constitutional amendments in December 1992. Through these reforms, local self-governance in rural and urban India was implemented.
- The Amendments came into an active on 1993, April 24, as the Constitution Act (73rd 'Amendment Act'), 1992, and on June 1, 1993, as the Constitution Act (74th 'Amendment Act'), 1992.
- The states were the only sub-national entities officially identified by the Indian constitution until the enactment of the 73rd and 74th constitutional amendments. And the Constitution grants great constitutional power to the individual states.
Learn more about Constitutional amendments
How constitutional amendments helped India to be more federal? Explain.
https://brainly.in/question/14481249
What do understand by constitutional amendments why is necessary
https://brainly.in/question/4888041