History, asked by ahananegi, 1 year ago

discuss the salt march to make clear why it was an effective number of resistance

Answers

Answered by chauhankritika80
5

Salt March was an effective symbol of resistance against colonialism because

(i) All classes could identify with salt as it was a cheap and essential food item.
(ii) Tax on salt and the monopoly over its manufacturing was a sign of the oppression of British Rule.
(iii) It would affect the British Economy.
Gandhiji reached Dandi on 12th March, 1930 and violated salt law by manufacturing salt from sea water. Breaking the salt law was an apparent defiance of British authority and was a direct challenge to British Rule in India. It had a far reaching repercussion on the whole structure of colonialism.

Answered by Anonymous
2

Answer:

Answer:

Gandhiji thought the salt was an effective symbol of resistance against colonialism because it was done in revolt against a commodity- salt, used by the rich and the poor alike. An item of daily use could resonate more with all classes of citizens than an abstract demand for greater political rights.

The tax on salt and the government monopoly over its production was a severely oppressive administrative move.

By breaking the salt law India showed their intention of non-cooperation and to break the oppressive colonial laws.

The Salt March was effective also because Gandhiji met a large number of commoners during the march and he taught them the true meaning of swaraj and non-violence. By peacefully defying law and making salt against government orders,

Gandhiji set forth an example to the whole nation of how the oppressor could be confronted in a non-violent manner. This also led to the Civil Disobedience Movement in 1930.

Similar questions