Question

Distinguish between concrete and abstract ethnobotany

Answer 1

Abstract and concrete are classifications that denote whether a term describes an object with a physical referent or one with no physical referents. They are most commonly used in philosophy and semantics. Abstract objects are sometimes called abstracta (sing. abstractum) and concrete objects are sometimes called concreta (sing. concretum). An abstract object is an object which does not exist at any particular time or place, but rather exists as a type of thing, i.e., an idea, or abstraction.[1] The term abstract object is said to have been coined by Willard Van Orman Quine.[2] The study of abstract objects is called abstract object theory.

Answer 2

Concept Introduction:-

The methodical process of organising knowledge about the cosmos into testable, comprehensible, and predictable hypotheses is known as science.

Explanation:-

We have been given a question that distinguish between concrete and abstract ethnobotany.

We need to find the solution to the question.

There are two categories: abstract and concrete, which indicate whether a phrase refers to an object having a physical reference or one without. They are most frequently employed in semantics and philosophy. Concrete items are sometimes referred to as concreta, while abstract ones are referred to as abstracta (sing. abstractum) (sing. concretum). An abstract object is a form of entity, such as a concept or abstraction, that does not actually exist at any specific moment or location. The phrase "abstract object" is credited to Willard Van Orman Quine. Abstract object theory is the study of abstract objects.

Final Answer:-

The correct answer is there are two categories: abstract and concrete, which indicate whether a phrase refers to an object having a physical reference or one without.

#SPJ2