Question

Distinguish between the isolationists and integrationist
viewpoints towards the tribal Societies-​

Answer 1

Explanation:

Like any Indian, you already know that ‘caste’ is the name of an ancient socialinstitution that has been part of Indian history and culture for thousands ofyears. But like any Indian living in the twenty-first century, you also know thatsomething called ‘caste’ is definitely a part of Indian society today. To whatextent are these two ‘castes’ – the one that is supposed to be part of India’spast, and the one that is part of its present – the same thing? This is thequestion that we will try to answer in this sectiob

Answer 2

Isolated tribes are indigenous peoples who live without permanent contact with neighboring communities and the international community. Integration also means promoting the skills and qualifications of men and women in the tribal communities and participating in the modern economy on an equal basis with the rest of the population, while ensuring that the natural resources available in the tribal land are used productively for the benefit of the nation as whole.

Explanation:

• The integration issues concern the bringing to the tribal populations of the fruits of modern development or containing the impacts of those elements of their traditions that are regarded harmful & archaic . It is also crucial to assure consistent and ongoing improvement in the nutrition, health & education standards of tribal people. The integrationist argued that the tribes were just backward community and they had to solve their problems in the same context as other backward classes.
• There is a traditional claim, which also comes from past practice, as follows: politically influential, economically powerful and astute national populace members would find various ways to gain ownership of the natural wealth of tribal areas , in order to make fortunes for themselves. The isolationist party claimed that Tribal needed protection from traders, borrowers and Christuan & Hindu missionaries, all of whom were eager to reduce Tribal to a debasement of landless jobs to "de-tribalised landless labour".
• The economic activity of mineral resources also brings together numerous people from the continent, which reduces tribal populations to a marginal position in their  land.These events prevent tribal peoples from living harmoniously in their habitat with their resources. Since they have been made homeless and rootless, they ca not use their livelihoods as bonded labor. They become commodities. Therefore, integration policies virtually always fail to function with the identity and lifestyle of the tribal population.
• The counterpoint to this is less stridently but often convincingly stated as follows: almost all persons of the nation have developed over a period of time including most of the dominant population groups. They no longer live in their ancestors 'habitat, live in their ancestors' livelihoods or practice the same traditions of their ancestors. This argument says that tribal people are virtually unusual. The natural resources of the tribal regions are national resources and should therefore be utilized for the country's development. This should be done without causing damages the populations living in those regions.