Distinguish between the Moderates and the Extremists in terms of their objective and methodologies.
Answers
Explanation:
he 1907 session of the Indian National Congress saw the splitting of the party into two different factions.
Although they shared the common goal the idea of an independent India, how they approached the matter was entirely different.

This article will give a proper understanding of the differences between the moderates and the extremists of the Indian National Congress, which is important for a Civil Services aspirant as questions are repeatedly asked on this topic in the UPSC Prelims examinations.
The difference between Moderates and Extremists are given in the table below:
Differences Moderates and Extremists
Moderates
Extremists
Moderates believed in Liberalism and Moderate Politics. They believed that the British rulers were merely unaware of the plight of the Indian masses and that once they were made aware the British authorities would do their utmost to improve the lives of the local populace.The Extremist leaders firmly believed that the British had no interest of the Indian people in mind. It was evident from the lacklustre response from the authorities during a plague or famineThe moderates found their support base in the Zamindars and the upper-middle-classThe extremists found their support bases among the educated middle-class and lower classesModerates wanted greater autonomy and self-rule while still under the nominal rule of the British crownExtremists wanted completed independence from British ruleModerates limited their struggle to constitutional meansExtremists often used extra-constitutional methods often during their activitiesPrayer, Petition, Persuasion, and Philanthropy. Their demands were constitutional, and so was their agitation. Their methods were regarded as ‘Passive Resistance’.Extremists were radical in terms of their approach, and believed in militant methods including but not limited to the assassination of key personnel.Dadabai Naoroji, A.O. HumeLala Lajpat Rai, Bal Gangadhar Tilak
You can find similar topics by referring to the links given below:
Revision Points: Moderates and Extremists
Important Points on Surat Split
Difference Between the Non-Cooperation Movement and Civil Disobedience Movement
Difference Between Governor-General and Viceroy
You can find more Difference Between Articles, by visiting the linked page
Difference Between Moderates and Extremists –Download PDF Here
Frequently Asked Questions on Difference Between Moderates and Extremists
Q 1. What was the ideology of Moderates and Extremists during the Freedom Struggle?
Ans. Extremists were completely against British rule and wanted complete independence. The Modernists, on the other hand, wanted self-rule and greater autonomy and accepted nominal British rules.
Q 2. How were extremists different from moderates?
Ans. The Moderates believed that once Britishers would understand the Indian mass, they would work for their benefits and progress and improve the lives of the people. However, the Extremists firmly believed that the British authorities were not interested in the Indian people and lives.
Answer:
Moderates
Moderates believed in Liberalism and Moderate Politics. They believed that the British rulers were merely unaware of the plight of the Indian masses and that once they were made aware the British authorities would do their utmost to improve the lives of the local populace.
Extremists
The Extremist leaders firmly believed that the British had no interest of the Indian people in mind. It was evident from the lacklustre response from the authorities during a plague or famine.