Distinguish between the power sharing model accepted by Belgium and srilanka
Answers
Answered by
2
Belgium
1.They adopted a policy of power sharing.
2. They gave equal powers to all communities.. minor or major doesn’t matter
3.It solved the problem.
SriLanka
1)They adopted a policy of Majoritarioism.
2) They gave preferences to the majority Sinhala group alone, disregarding the minority
3). It only increased the problem
1.They adopted a policy of power sharing.
2. They gave equal powers to all communities.. minor or major doesn’t matter
3.It solved the problem.
SriLanka
1)They adopted a policy of Majoritarioism.
2) They gave preferences to the majority Sinhala group alone, disregarding the minority
3). It only increased the problem
Answered by
1
Hii friend........
(i) The Belgium leaders tried to solve the ethnic problem by respecting the feelings and interests of different communities and regions,whereas the Sri lankan government tried to solve the problem through majoritarianism
(ii) Belgium leaders established a federal structure under which power was shared between Union Government and its other constituent units whereas Sri lankan leaders adopted Unitary Government structute
(iii) The Belgium solutiom helped in avoiding civic strife whereas the majoritarianism in Sri Lanka lead to the civil war
THANKS
HOPE IT HELPS U☆☆☆
(i) The Belgium leaders tried to solve the ethnic problem by respecting the feelings and interests of different communities and regions,whereas the Sri lankan government tried to solve the problem through majoritarianism
(ii) Belgium leaders established a federal structure under which power was shared between Union Government and its other constituent units whereas Sri lankan leaders adopted Unitary Government structute
(iii) The Belgium solutiom helped in avoiding civic strife whereas the majoritarianism in Sri Lanka lead to the civil war
THANKS
HOPE IT HELPS U☆☆☆
Similar questions