Question

do u agree with the action of the man at the end ​

Answer 1

Answer:

The man’s action can be understood as justified retribution (vengeance, revenge, punishment). We must remember the fact that after having tried repeatedly for justice in a peaceful manner and only after being wronged repeatedly does the man go to the extreme extent of burning down the hut along with all the animals inside. Even here, the truth remains that if the animals hadn’t illegally occupied the hut which was not built by them, the tragic fate wouldn’t have fallen on them. Thus, in whichever angle we take, the man’s action can be understood and justified. We should remember that tolerating crime is as bad as committing it.