.Do you agree that Louis XVI was an inefficient ruler? Give two reasons to support
your opinion. Mention any three ways by which he could have avoided the revolution?
Answers
Answer:Through a close analysis, to a certain extent Louis XVI plays a major role in the advance of the French revolution. He was responsible for aspects of the revolution, but it was an event which was ready for creation, and nothing was going to terminate its destiny. The times prior were becoming extremely difficult, and France was becoming a worn-out, desperate country suffocating from finances and other communal issues. There were numerous causes for why the revolution took place such as the great division in society and specific events, and Louis XVI plays a minor role as the authority figure through the hardship and change. Thus, Louis XVI becomes a vulnerable king who receives a substantial amount of blame for the revolution.
Explanation:
Explanation:
yes I agree that Louis XVI was an inefficient ruler because
1) He use to get in a secret negotiation with other ruler as Prussia .
2) He increased the taxes lieved on third estate and he also enable to give up his debt of 2billion livers.
That's why he is an inefficient ruler.
Any three ways by which he could have avoided the revolution are:
1) he tries to use his power in negative way by sending his soldiers to attack on revolutionaries.
2) he increases prices of bread.
3) his people like chateaux attack on peasants and farmers.
I think u Understand the answer.