do you believe in God or not ??justify ur answer.....if yes then also and if no then also justify
the answers should have powerful content......
AARCHI
Brainlynostalgia:
Can we fix the boundary of universe? Can we atleast predict what was before bigbang? Nope,are we even sure about our existence? Till the date, none has figured out that our existence here is just an illusion or reality. So first find out and understand that whether believe in our existence or not. Then boast about the clues of existence of god and believes.
Good sentences and well pronounced, Neo
can i just ask about ur opinions on our existence being an illusion......like if u guys dont mind
Answers
Answered by
3
Sometimes I thing like god is there and sometimes I think like no.I am completely neutral .some books says god is there and I think god is there,he made us all but practically when I think its like I can't see god then he is not there.
Yup...it's in a way better to be neutral.
Yes, God is all around the world
Answered by
4
Have you heard of Pascal's Wager?
Let me put it this way:
If we assume that if a single God exists, with an odd of 1, there half chances for each of the case:
Either a God exists or not, let's discuss both, let's mark our favorable points with x (for believers) and y for atheists:
Case 1: GOD EXISTS :
In this case, if you're a theist, you'll get the eternal peace of heaven, if he exists, which we assume to be true in this case, therefore there's a gain (advantage) for Theists in this case, and a loss for atheists(for they may go to hell, if this case be true),
so, x=1, y=-1
Case 2: GOD DOES NOT EXIST :
In this case, whether you're a theist or an atheist doesn't really matter, no one will get any profit either way, so our x and y remain unchanged
if you want, you may increase y, for you may say "oh well, the atheist have some advantages here, cuz God never existed and they led a free life, in their own way) so let's increase y by one, y = 0 now
You can see x-y > 1 (considering both the cases)
x>y
That means :
Being a theist has more advantage than being an atheist!
INFERENCE: God still may or may not existed, let's be agnostic, but certainly you're at less risk by being a theist !
Sometimes you have to believe in things, whether they be true or not, to get through life easily!
Thanks.
#Sinner
Let me put it this way:
If we assume that if a single God exists, with an odd of 1, there half chances for each of the case:
Either a God exists or not, let's discuss both, let's mark our favorable points with x (for believers) and y for atheists:
Case 1: GOD EXISTS :
In this case, if you're a theist, you'll get the eternal peace of heaven, if he exists, which we assume to be true in this case, therefore there's a gain (advantage) for Theists in this case, and a loss for atheists(for they may go to hell, if this case be true),
so, x=1, y=-1
Case 2: GOD DOES NOT EXIST :
In this case, whether you're a theist or an atheist doesn't really matter, no one will get any profit either way, so our x and y remain unchanged
if you want, you may increase y, for you may say "oh well, the atheist have some advantages here, cuz God never existed and they led a free life, in their own way) so let's increase y by one, y = 0 now
You can see x-y > 1 (considering both the cases)
x>y
That means :
Being a theist has more advantage than being an atheist!
INFERENCE: God still may or may not existed, let's be agnostic, but certainly you're at less risk by being a theist !
Sometimes you have to believe in things, whether they be true or not, to get through life easily!
Thanks.
#Sinner
Further, if god exists in such form
Does that necessarily imply that heaven and hell exists?Thus Pascal's wager fails if we step out of such faulty assumptions.
Does that necessarily imply that heaven and hell exists?Thus Pascal's wager fails if we step out of such faulty assumptions.
Okay, checkmate lol
There are odds, possibilities vs probabilities, for every case : God exists, God's a force, God's a superhuman, God's a Satan lol, God's an angel, God is Jesus, God is one, God is many, God is not there et cetera, i think the case that'll keep us at the highest stake is Pascal's case ?
hey can u please give a bit easy answer which should not be related to physics or maths
lol, will you trust my words blindly then? They'd be my personal opinions after all, so is this one ! Believe in what you find appealing by yourself!
ok
First off, Math fails when possibilities(as it is infinite and immense for a single case) are possible for a case. A condition which involves finite outcomes can only be interpreted by mathematical probability.
In this case if possibilities exist then this cannot be dealt in math and can be dealt only with philosophy. Then how it come Pascal devoloping a math interpretation of atheism/theism? So an interpretation which carries no math in it and even not sure about its credibility can keep us at highest stake?
The problem is that Pascal tried to exaggerate upoun flaws of abrahamic faith avoiding its gems. I hope that ancient indian scriptures dealt with this concept in more acceptible way. Of course it also contains several flaws. But the god is depicted as a more philosophical element in ancient scriptures. Quest for understand god can never meet its end!
Foreal, I concur!
Similar questions