History, asked by nagpalaarav138, 9 months ago


Do you remember what Amir Khusrau had to say regarding Sanskrit, knowledge and Brahmanas?
How do historians divide the past into periods? Do they face any problems in doing so?
In what ways has the meaning of the term “Hindustan” changed over the centuries?
How were the affairs of Jatis regulated?
What does the term pan regional empire mean?
Find out whether and how long your state was part of these pan regional empires?

Answers

Answered by rockansh98
2

Answer:

Answer:Amir khusrau, said that Sanskrit did not belong to any region. It was an old language common people did not know it. only the Brahmanas spoke it.

please like and make it brainlient. Hope it will help you!

Answered by mariumm14
2

Answer:

Amir khusrau, said that Sanskrit did not belong to any region. It was an old language common people did not know it. only the Brahmanas spoke it.

Historians divide the past into large segments—periods—that possess shared characteristics. ... Historians face many problems while dividing the past into periods. The reason is that there was a good amount of technological development in the medieval period which can be called modern in the contemporary context.

In the thirteenth century the term "Hindustan" meant the areas of Punjab, Haryana and the lands between the Ganga and Yamuna. The term was used in the political sense for lands that were a part of the dominions of the Delhi Sultan.

The affairs of the Jatis were regulated by an assembly of elders, known in some areas as the jati panchayat.The term pan-regional empire is applied to an empire which stretches over many regions.

Pan regional Empire is a nation which influences other nations, actions completely or partially.The term pan regional Empire mean the empires which were spanning diverse regions which was expanded to a larger areas or regions like dynasties of Cholas, Khaljis,Tughluqs and Mughals.

Explanation:

Similar questions