English, asked by eisaakhtar, 7 hours ago

Do you think countries should spend money on saving wild animals from extinction? Give reasons and examples to support your view.

Answers

Answered by rajputbrijesh108
0

Answer:

it is a righ paragraph of this question

Attachments:
Answered by Disha094
4

Yes, particularly in legislation for protections, and in education of the public.

Once animals are extinct, they are gone forever. We will never, ever see them again.

So people need to know the ones in danger. Most people do not know the vast number of wonderful creatures here on the planet….pretty much unique in all the universe. Whether you believe God created them individually, or set things in motion so that they came to be, or had nothing to do with it…either way, the diversity is staggering. What we see as children is a FRAGMENT of the rich world we live in.

Many of the most wonderful creatures went extinct specifically due to human greed.

1 The first step in wanting to protect what you have is to feel the loss of what you will never get to see. Not because it is far away, or you might have to go to the zoo, but because it is annihilated. The only images we have are the ones that survive or what people imagine. Here are some you may not have heard of:

The thylacine, also known as the Tasmanian Tiger. This was a marsupial, meaning it carried the pups in a pouch. Not very large, it mainly fed on birds and rodents. It was the only marsupial that was a predator like a dog or cat. Some people kept them as pets.

Sheep ranchers (sheep, which we still have today) got all hysterical thinking they were killing sheep. In reality, it later turned out to be loose dogs, which are much larger. The government was swayed by them - and their money - and put out a bounty of $1 each on the animals. That was it.

When scientists realized they were about to be extinct, they tried to stop it, but it was too late. Hunters killed the last ones in the wild proudly and took pictures. Sheep losses pretty much

the

Similar questions