Do you think it is good to elect a President for life or is it better to hold regular elections after every five years. Give reasons.
OR
What is the difference between democracy and good democracy? 5 points
Answers
Answer:
No, it is not good to elect a President for life. But it is certainly better to hold regular elections after a fixed tenure, which should be of five years. The reasons are given below:
(i) Rulers elected by the people can take a final decision on all the major issues.
(ii) Such elections offer a choice and fair opportunity to the people to change the current rulers.
(iii) This choice and opportunity is available to all the people on an equal basis.
(iv) The exercise of this choice leads to a government limited by basic rules of the constitutional and citizen's right.
Thus, we can say that holding regular elections after a fixed tenure ensure health government.
OR
Democracy refers to a government in which it is elected by the people, for the people and to the people. Whereas good democracy refers to a democracy in which no discrimination take place and everyone is equal before law. Also government is appointed by people choice and not by malpractices.
Explanation:
Mark as Brainlist !!!!!!!1
Answer:
NO DEFINITELY NOT
Explanation:
It's not at all practical to elect some one as a president for life. Regular elections are much better than this.
Regular elections ensure that the present president remains well in his own power and doesn't misuse his authority.
Also with regular elections many new candidates will also get the chance to get elected as the president.
Besides, elections present a kind of reward and punishment system, this persuades the government and the president to work for the people , willingly or unwillingly.