Do you think it is good to elect someone President for life? Or is it better to hold regular elections after every few years?
Answers
Answered by
184
No, definitely not. It's not at all practical to elect some one as a president for life. Regular elections are much better than this.
Regular elections ensure that the present president remains well in his own power and doesn't misuse his authority.
Also with regular elections many new candidates will also get the chance to get elected as the president.
Besides, elections present a kind of reward and punishment system, this persuades the government and the president to work for the people , willingly or unwillingly.
Regular elections ensure that the present president remains well in his own power and doesn't misuse his authority.
Also with regular elections many new candidates will also get the chance to get elected as the president.
Besides, elections present a kind of reward and punishment system, this persuades the government and the president to work for the people , willingly or unwillingly.
Answered by
43
Answer:No, it is not good to elect a president for life.But, it is certainly better to hold regular elections after every five years.
REASONS:
i)Regular elections provide an opportunity to the people to change the government if it does not act as per the will of the people
ii)Regular and fair elections are an important aspect of democracy.
Similar questions
English,
9 months ago
Science,
9 months ago
Math,
9 months ago
Social Sciences,
1 year ago
Social Sciences,
1 year ago
English,
1 year ago