History, asked by lucksomshar1, 3 months ago

do you think it was fair for the government to simply uproot these people out of their lives and homes and not provide any compensation for it?
give your views, for and against.

Answers

Answered by pnnll1553
0

Answer:

The law was drafted with the intention to discourage land acquisition. It was drafted so that land acquisition would become a route of last resort” Legislating for Justice: The Making of the 2013 Land Acquisition Law, by Jairam Ramesh and Muhammad Ali Khan

It is not often that the government enacts a law to discourage the very process the legislation aims to streamline. But the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, (LARR) is not just any piece of legislation. It deals with a controversial and highly emotive issue that has huge political implications and replaces a colonial-era law of 1894.

Explanation:

Answered by AaliyaMumbaiGirl
0

Answer:

No, it was not fair. They even did not provide them with compensation.

Explanation:

The law was drafted with the intention to discourage land acquisition. It was drafted so that land acquisition would become a route of last resort” Legislating for Justice: The Making of the 2013 Land Acquisition Law, by Jairam Ramesh and Muhammad Ali Khan

It is not often that the government enacts a law to discourage the very process the legislation aims to streamline. But the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, (LARR) is not just any piece of legislation. It deals with a controversial and highly emotive issue that has huge political implications and replaces a colonial-era law of 1894.

Similar questions