Do you think sita and draupadi were victims of male dominated society???????? Please answer in brief
Answers
Good evening dear !!
Yes , sita and draupadi were victims of male dominated society.
---- ---- -----
Hope it helps....
Følløw me
Answer:
yes, they were
Explanation:
As a result of their position, they had to endure something that could be perceived as humiliation and are proven to be above reproach. Draupadi’s disrobing is a moment that would test the character of any person, but her commitment to Krishna who responds with providing her with the endless sari is a testament to her faith. Sita had to endure the abduction by Ravana and withstand his horrendous advances only to come back to Ayodha and walk through the fire to prove her purity for the citizens to take her back.
Both of them also challenges the male authority structures, but in different ways. Draupadi questions why she is seen as something to be bartered in a wager, suggesting that the notion of womanhood, in general, is not something to be seen as objects. Sita’s devotion to Lord Ram is the standard for all loyalty, yet she refuses to stand by him when she cannot be welcomed back to Ayodha with open and authentic reception, leaving him to be alone.
Sita's Image:-
While Sita is the epitome of devotion, there is a tendency to dismiss her as the victim of patriarchy. This is a misreading of her because she, like Lord Ram, is a product of the time period which curtailed everyone’s freedom.
Draupadi's Image:-
In the modern predicament, both of them are seen in some level of divergent lights. Draupadi is seen as someone who forces men to acknowledge their own savagery and cruelty, as she does not fight back, but rather devotes herself to Krishna during the disrobing.