Do you think that informal changes to the Constitution are as important as formal amendments? Explain why, using supporting information from your reading.
Answers
Answered by
0
dont know and sorry friend
Answered by
5
Answer:
I think informal changes to the constitution are less important compared to the formal changes. This is because:
Explanation:
- Informal changes are not law and therefore have no repercussions. They can or cannot be applied at will while formal changes have to be followed.
- Informal changes to the constitution cannot be accounted for and their progress tracked while the formal changes can be accounted for and their performance tracked to know the results.
- Informal changes are temporary while formal changes last making the law of the state.
Similar questions