do you think that the british record reveal exact historical information? why/why not
Answers
Answered by
53
The way that the British kept a correct record of their administers in India itself is adequate to make us trust that they needed to keep a nitty gritty record of their dealings here in India. It is apparent that the British kept the record of their office in India from 1600 to 1947 which incorporates archives identifying with the organization of India under the Company Rule and British-run the show.
Many records identified with Gandhi's responses and developments were set apart as "Most Secret", "Exceptionally Secret" and "Top Secret" Such records do give us an understanding that their records contained correct authentic data. In the event that they needed to be manipulative, they could even get rid of the way toward recording.
Many records identified with Gandhi's responses and developments were set apart as "Most Secret", "Exceptionally Secret" and "Top Secret" Such records do give us an understanding that their records contained correct authentic data. In the event that they needed to be manipulative, they could even get rid of the way toward recording.
Answered by
20
Answer:
No, British records may not reveal exact historical information. Such records may just reflect the British point of view. The records may also get influenced by British biases and prejudices.
Explanation:
Please mark as brainliest
Similar questions