Question

do you think that the history of India would have been different if humayun had not captured Delhi and Agra? give reasons for your answer?​

Answer 1

Yess, Humayun was a weak ruler. One of the main points is he wasn't a good military leader like his father and was more into studying and nature. Because he lacked the military skills his throne was taken away from him twice. Once by sheer shah Suri and once by his son. Yes, they died and now Humayun had a chance to take the throne back again. but because the empire was already weakened because Akbar had kill sultan Lodhi so the ppl from the Rajasthan area rose against Humayun. six months from being the emperor, Humayun fell at the steps of his library and was dead a few days later in Dehli