Do you think the verdict by the commission of enquiry was on the expected lines ?why?
Answers
No, the verdict given by the commission of inquiry was not on the expected lines.
During the inquiry, the elephant was given the full opportunity to express his side of the verdict while the man was not given a chance to speak up. Also, Mr. Hyena and the other members of the jungle were on the side of the elephant and they gave their verdict in his favor.
Explanation:
Author Jomo Kenyatta was an African Political leader, first President of Kenya uses this fable ‘Gentlemen of the jungle’ to expose power mongerness of European power.
During the trial Mr. Hyena and other elders of the jungle took elephant’s side and the man was not given even a chance to state his case. So as expected the verdict came in favor of the elephant.
:) :) :) :) :)