Question

do you think the verdict by the commission of enquiry was on the expected lines?why​

Answer 1

No, the verdict given by the commission of inquiry was not on the expected lines. During the inquiry, the elephant was given the full opportunity to express his side of the verdict while the man was not given a chance to speak up.

I guess you dont remember me dear ....hehe its ok

well i am Junnie ( or you can say Junie ...hehe)

old id sanskritijs17...

now remember me ?

my that i.d got ban.ned

Answer 2

Answer:

from the story: The Gentlemen of the Jungle

Explanation:

• No, now no longer so. The verdict with the aid of using the Commission of Enquiry is withinside the favor of the elephant. The cause is that each one of the participants of the Inquiry fee is from the animal side. They did now no longer rent everyone to again him up.
• The participants of the fee had been properly handled with the aid of using the elephant. It gave them a scrumptious meal to the participants of the Enquiry fee. After playing the meal, on the cost of the Rt.Hon.Mn Elephant, they reached their verdict.
• The elephant shall preserve the profession of his hut, however, we provide him permission to search for a website wherein he can construct every other hut greater acceptable for your needs, and that they promised to present him excessive protection. The verdict in favor of the elephant indignant the person. This is unjust to the person withinside the situation.

#SPJ2