Does art always have a function?Why? Support your response. provide your own example.
Answers
Answer:
Yes. The function of Art is subjective but nonetheless, Art will always function as Ar until the object is not considered as art anymore. Everything that has a purpose has a function.
"The function of Art is biased but anyway, Art will always function as Ar until the object is not considered as art anymore"
Explanation:
Everything that has a motive has a function. If a work of art is decorative and filling a space on my wall, isn’t it filling a function. If a work of religious art provides me with a focus and meaning for my divine devotions, isn’t that a function? The 18th centurial hand-blown glasses I was disposed by a great-aunt are functional I drink my sherry from them but they are also lovely to look at, a pleasure to hold. More functions. In building, Mies van der Rohe spoken form follows function and less is more. Robert Venturi respond with less is a boredom. Any form of architecture is a priori functional, but closely all architecture as a matter of meaningful design is a form of art. A poem exists only to be read, to engender feelings, provoke thought. Can we consider that that is a function? Music is pure aesthetic experience but it is also entertainment. In fact, I can’t consider of a single art that CAN’T be explained as entertainment. I pretend craft always has a function. Do I care? Not one whit.