Does George Washington's account contradict or support the account in the newspaper? Give two examples to support your response
Answers
Answered by
18
Answer: Both the newspaper account and Washington's account explain that the British were defeated when they panicked on the battlefield. But the newspaper account explains the loss differently. It says, for example, that there was an unknown number of enemy fighters, while Washington says there were no more than 300. thanks
Explanation: hope it helps u
Answered by
3
Answer:
Sample Response: Washington's account and the newspaper account both detail how the British were beaten because they lost control of the situation on the battlefield. However, the loss is explained differently in the newspaper article.
Explanation:
- For instance, it claims that the number of enemy fighters was unknown, although Washington claims that there were no more than 300.
- When he was originally deployed to the Ohio Valley to face the expanding French presence in the area, George Washington was a young man of 21 who was ambitious and raw. He set off the French and Indian War with his deeds.
- Both the British and their French adversaries were keenly interested in gaining control of the vast Ohio Valley region, particularly in the area close to the confluence of the Monongahela and Allegheny rivers (modern-day Pittsburgh). The Ohio, which connected to the Mississippi, and other rivers served as vital transportation routes for the items produced in this productive area.
#SPJ2
Similar questions
English,
4 months ago
Math,
4 months ago
History,
9 months ago
World Languages,
9 months ago
Science,
1 year ago