does proper implementation of Land Ceiling Act eliminated poverty
Answers
Answered by
4
Hey Mate Here Is Your Answer
Very impressive question. Thanks a lot. I will tell you a story.
In many countries the power of the land ownership is still in the hands of landlords.
In the 20th century many developing countries tried to pose some policies for land reforms to make it more fair. By this way, poor people started to own their land and do their own farming. But there was a bid problem, of course, the former land lords were not happy with this situation and the illiterate poor peasants never appreciate the gift given by the government. Peasant didn't show much afford to keep their lands since they didn't fight for it but former land lords kept struggling to regain the privilege of owning the land including the peasant on it. In short time illiterate peasants gradually sold their shares to lords for very small prices since they don't know how to farm, produce and sell their outputs and they missed their ex-shepherds. At the end of the story, landlords collected the land shares again and the region went back to its original order. Land lords kept herding those people on their lands and exploit the benefits of this order. This order then has been seen very useful by the central government in terms of collecting votes since it was very easy and cheaper to gather all the votes from one particular region by conniving a landlord. If you find "the leverage points" which could have made this unsuccessful land reform story a successful one, you may go somewhere.
Of course there may be some different cases on this subject. But leverage point should be expected in some generic points for almost all.
Very impressive question. Thanks a lot. I will tell you a story.
In many countries the power of the land ownership is still in the hands of landlords.
In the 20th century many developing countries tried to pose some policies for land reforms to make it more fair. By this way, poor people started to own their land and do their own farming. But there was a bid problem, of course, the former land lords were not happy with this situation and the illiterate poor peasants never appreciate the gift given by the government. Peasant didn't show much afford to keep their lands since they didn't fight for it but former land lords kept struggling to regain the privilege of owning the land including the peasant on it. In short time illiterate peasants gradually sold their shares to lords for very small prices since they don't know how to farm, produce and sell their outputs and they missed their ex-shepherds. At the end of the story, landlords collected the land shares again and the region went back to its original order. Land lords kept herding those people on their lands and exploit the benefits of this order. This order then has been seen very useful by the central government in terms of collecting votes since it was very easy and cheaper to gather all the votes from one particular region by conniving a landlord. If you find "the leverage points" which could have made this unsuccessful land reform story a successful one, you may go somewhere.
Of course there may be some different cases on this subject. But leverage point should be expected in some generic points for almost all.
Similar questions
Computer Science,
6 months ago
Physics,
6 months ago
Math,
6 months ago
English,
1 year ago
History,
1 year ago