Dr james herriot was a competent veterinary surgeon. his practical approach and common sense helped in the rapid recovery of tricki. comment.
Answers
Answer:
your answer will be like this
Explanation:
. Herriot enjoyed the lavish meal during Trick’s stay but still, he felt compelled to inform Mrs Humphrey about the recovery of Tricky. Why did he not keep Tricky for a longer time? Did he feel concerned for Mrs Humphrey? Was it not in his attitude to break the trust others. Discuss the values he possessed in 100-120 words.
Ans. Tricky was a fat dog, pet of Mrs Humphrey. He became listless and seemed to have no energy. It fell ill. So, Mrs Humphrey called the veterinary surgeon, Dr Herriot for the help. Dr Herriot took Tricky to his surgery. He kept an eye on him for two days and gave him no food but plenty of water. At the end of the second day, he started showing some interest in his surroundings and on the third day, began to whimper on the sound of dogs. While his stay at the surgery, Mrs Humphrey started to bring round fresh eggs to a dozen at a time. She also sent bottles of wine and brandy for Trick’s health. But that was consumed by Mr Herriot and his eel leagues. Hence, Herriot enjoyed the stay of Tricky. He did not want to keep Tricky for a longer time because he felt concerned for Mrs Humphrey. He did not want to separate the pet from his owner. He could understand Mrs Pumphrey’s concern for the little dog. So he returned! him back.
2. The chapter shows the silly and negligent behaviour of rich people like Mrs Pumphrey who may harm their near and dear ones by their extra caring nature. Trick’s declined health was the outcome of Mrs Pumphrey’s over-caring nature. Do you think such people’s actions can prove to be fatal for the health of their kinds? What values would you suggest to such people to emulate in themselves and why? Write your answer in 100-120 words.
Ans. Mrs Pumphrey was a wealthy lady with a fat pet dog named Tricky. Tricky was too dear to Mrs Pumphrey. Hence, she took extra care of him. She had pampered the dog with all kinds of comforts. The dog had many coats worn according to the weather, had different cushions for his comfort and also had various dishes to eat. Some extras between meals were given to him, some malt, cod- liver oil and a bowl of Horlicks at night to make him sleep. He was also given cream cakes and chocolates. This made him fat and lethargic. He became hugely fat like a bloated sausage. His eyes bloodshot and rheumy, stared straight ahead and his tongue lolled from his jaws. I think Mrs Pumphrey’s extra-caring nature resulted in Trick’s declined health. Such an attitude can result to be fatal for the health of their kins. One should not over care for them. Exercise and proper meal are important for one’s health. The same was taken care by Dr Herriot, which resulted in the speedy recovery of Tricky.
3.”He had never been known to refuse food; he would tackle a meal at any hour of the day or night.” Herriot believed that Trick’s problem was his greed. Did he lack tolerance? What values would you like Tricky to imbibe? Elucidate.
Ans. Dr Herriot was not entirely wrong in believing that Trick’s problem was greed. Tricki was indeed greedy, but Mrs Pumphrey only made matters worse by stuffing him with rich food. Herriot did not lack intolerance; he was just stating the obvious. Trick’s ill-health made him concerned, and he made the observation as a veterinary doctor. Tricky, on the other hand, needed to exercise control on his eating habits. It would have been good if he did not greedily gobble up everything that was placed in front of him. Mrs Pumphrey herself reveals that Tricky loved cream cakes and chocolates very much. Thus, Tricky ought to have been less gluttonous and luxury-loving, and behaved more like a dog!