Social Sciences, asked by aarinimris, 2 days ago

Earlier in India, A jury of 5-6 judges used to sit in a court case and gave the verdict only when all the judges agreed. And I think that it was more advantageous because there was no chance of Bribing in anyway. So why was this practice ended in India.

No spamming please

The one with the fastest answer will be followed and marked as the BRAINLIEST.

Answers

Answered by amritadixit977

1

Answer:

Because this was very hard for big people to escape so they made people judge who were thinking like them

Explanation:

plz mark me brainlist

Previous Question

Next Question

Similar questions

Political Science, 1 day ago

What are the election process??

Science, 1 day ago

1) What food item did you prepare in your classroom using cutting and chopping Methods write the procedure and the materials you use before preparation...

English, 1 day ago

Essay on Detached Interdependence...(200-250 words)...

Math, 2 days ago

4 A bus leaves suntown station every 18 minutes and a trein leaves every 10 minutes. A bus and train both leave at 91oo. How many more times before 17:00 will bus and a train leave at the same time.

Math, 2 days ago

bags of paddy sold at Rs.200 ab 2.17085 is haid towards a loan, the amount is a ...

Physics, 8 months ago

derive an expression for maximum velocity for the vehicle in a banked road...

English, 8 months ago

doraemon ka birthday kab h...

English, 8 months ago

Class Roll ..... Sec. Reading Comprehension (Seen) 1. Read the text and answer the given questions : Little Phulmani is surprised to know that many of the Indian dance forms started within the temples. Phulmanı is a natural dancer. She loves to dance to the rhythm of the drum like all the other members of her community. Her teacher said that folk dance is a popular art form among the various...