History, asked by vicky446312, 9 months ago

elobrate the differences between the turkish-invaders ghazni and ghori

Answers

Answered by HeroicGRANDmaster
2

Explanation:

Mahmud of Ghazni.

He made several invasions in India.He raided many cities, including Mathura, Kanauj, Gwalior and Sindh and carried away India's rich treasures to his country. But he was not a ruler so far as India was concerned .

Muhammad Ghori.

In fact, the foundation of the Turkish rule in India was laid by Muhammad Ghori. His first invasion was directed against Multan in 1175 AD. In 1192 he eventually defeated Prithviraj Chauhan , the ruler of vast territories from Ajmer to Delhi. He then went back to Ghazni leaving Qutb-ud-din Aibak in charge of his territories in India. However, in 1194 he again led an army to fight Jai Chand,the ruler of Kanauj.. He returned to Ghazni and during his absence Qutb-ud-din had to quell many revolts and disturbances in India.After Muhammad Ghori died Qutb-ud-din led the foundatio of Delhi Sultanate in 1206.

Thus, the major difference that we can find between mahmud Ghazni and Muhammad ghori's invasion is : the invasion of Muhammad Ghori led to the foundation of turkish rule in India whereas Mahmud Ghazni's invasion only led away some of the riches of India..

Answered by dhruvstarjain
0
Ans= The turkish invaders ghanzi attacked ghori
Similar questions