English, asked by afreen12qwth, 10 months ago

Essay on civic


my brother needs it

#hatemybrother-__-​

Answers

Answered by lymyiamaiden
1

Answer:It should be obvious that the study of civics

reflects one’s concept of the nature of man, but the

issue has been muddied in the most extraordinary

manner. Christian civic culture must uphold the dignity of man, of each man since each one is a child

of God our Father. And it should be ordered to the

common good. What could be more obvious?

Tranquillitas Ordinis

This Latin term refers to the ordering of society for the true peace and security of its members.

It is the goal of Christian civics that each member

of society be able to develop his gifts and use them

for the knowledge and worship of God and for the

service of those around him.

The doctrine of the Incarnation, that the Son

of God lived on earth as true God and true man

implies that the divine life – and therefore any

degree of personal holiness – can be lived on earth.

This truth impels believers to seek true goodness

in all they do. In the civitas, the community of

mankind beyond the family or nomadic tribe, relationships among men must be regulated in complex

ways, called government. Christian civic theory

developed the idea that government must protect

inalienable rights, rights that are from God: specifically the gift of life, the gift of true interior liberty,

and the right to pursue true happiness, which is

God’s will for us in the world. Note: in its origin,

the concept of the pursuit of happiness specifically disallowed the pursuit of license or of anything

contrary to God’s law and man’s true happiness.

For all the years in which Christian culture was

the foundation of civic thought, it was understood

that laws must be made to maximize the opportunity to enjoy these inalienable rights, and any law

which came to be understood as contrary to God’s

law was immediately null and void. Until the end of

the nineteenth century, any law that could be shown

to be unjust was thereby shown not to be law. It

didn’t need to be repealed to lose its force; it was

immediately out of force.

Lincoln said it well, when he emphasized

the value of a government “of the people, by the

people, and for the people”. Christian government

demands the same observation of law from all the

people; it is conducted with the participation of all

the people inasmuch as all are equally indwelt by the

Spirit of God; and it works in the service of all the

people who are equally the children of one Heavenly Father.

Legal positivism

Legal positivism is the name of the radical

reconstruction of the philosophy of law which took

over the legal profession in the late nineteenth and

early twentieth centuries, totally reversing the Christian philosophy of law. According to this view, the

law is simply what the words say. That is what we

have before us, and all else is mere speculation. It is

a consequence of radical philosophical concepts of

uncertainty that this refuge was taken – we cannot

know meanings or history; all we have is the words,

and they are the law.

Once again, we are faced with the effect of

denying the possibility of knowing truth and being

forced to base our lives on something smaller. If we

cannot know God, if the Church cannot teach us

the truth, if scripture can be endlessly reinterpreted

so that it does not effectively teach, if there is no

human certainty, then our laws cannot be ordered to

the “good.” They are just words, temporary agreements between fallible human beings, and their only

reasonable goal is order; therefore they must be

limited to the meaning of the words, not the “truthful” or “good” intent of the authors. Justice is not

a meaningful concept when philosophy is not based

on truth.

This change in the basic philosophy of law is

the reason for the constitutional changes of our

century; laws can change if the meanings or understandings of the words change, even to mean the

opposite of the original intent. This is not a problem that can be solved by a constitutional convention; it will require a philosophical reawakening, and,

undergirding that, a religious conversion because it

will require confidence in the search for truth

Explanation: This might be helpful..

Answered by riyaz060
1

Answer:

do you have a good day please find the attached file is scanned image

Similar questions