Essay on should national boarders be jurisdictional boundaries rather than barrier to human movement
Answers
Answer:
The impact of globalization on the sovereignty of the modern state has been a source of great controversy among political scientists. In this article, I offer a framework for understanding the state as a boundary-setting institution, which changes shape and role over time and place. I argue that, rather than undermining the state, globalization is a product of a rearrangement of the purposes, boundaries, and sovereign authority of the state. Focusing on the United States, the article traces the changing shape of state sovereignty through a study of the patterns of immigration policy and politics over the past three decades. Immigration policy, I argue, provides a unique insight into the continuities and changes in the role of the state in an era of globalization.in a unitary nation have less economic effects, but more cultural and political effects. ... becoming obsolete and are no longer barriers to the movement of goods, ideas ... effects on political, cultural, and economic outcomes than do boundaries ... by exploring how human behavior would be affected by sub-national borders
Explanation:
Answer:
A border is a physical or imagined boundary dividing two geographic locations. Political boundaries exist along borders. Cities, counties, provinces, etc. are divided by them.
The territory under the jurisdiction of one governing body is delineated by a border. Only within its borders may a region's government enact and execute laws. Borders evolve with time. Violence is occasionally used by residents of one area to seize control of another. Sometimes land is peacefully exchanged or sold. After a battle, the land is frequently distributed through international accords. Borders can be drawn by a natural boundary, such as a river or a mountain range. Travel and migration are impacted by borders, particularly national boundaries. While most countries allow people to travel freely within their boundaries, adjacent countries may not. Adjacent nations' borders can be open and undefended when their economies and political systems are comparable. Every nation has its restrictions on who may enter, leave, and live within its borders. The types of employment and travel restrictions placed on noncitizens by visas and work permits include both the duration and place of employment. Officially referred to as permanent resident cards, "green cards" are issued by the United States and permit non-Americans to live, work, and enjoy legal protection within its borders. Borders can occasionally be used to keep people inside.
Countries like Myanmar and Cuba, in addition to North Korea, rarely permit their citizens to traverse their borders. this gives the impression that authoritarian states are too controlling of movement, which is true. free movement becomes a problem when people begin to burden the economy of a country by acting as liabilities. they don't work and contribute to the economy. this reduces the GDP and the per capita income, which is the most reliable measure of a country's development. free movement should be permitted as long as the people migrating to other countries enter lawfully and act as an asset to the nation's economy by working lawfully and paying taxes.
#SPJ2