essay on topic .a top scorer in maths may not be mathematically intelligent in day to day accounts.
Answers
Answer:
Yes, A top scorer in math might not be mathematically intelligent in day to day accounts.
Explanation-
Being able to recollect and follow equations and check your work doesn't necessarily imply intelligence to any extent further than having the ability to follow a recipe. At the foremost basic level, the key to being good at mathematics is nothing quite having the ability to follow a process. having the ability to construct equations to resolve planet problems might indicate a far better actual grasp and utility, but this doesn't necessarily translate into nonmathematical intelligence. Personally I’ve known several folks that happened to be quite capable at math, but otherwise they were dumb as rocks. They were terribly ignorant, couldn’t articulate themselves coherently or follow a conversation to avoid wasting their lives, couldn’t grasp very basic life stuff, not quick wits or deep thinkers by any means. At the upper levels of IQ, people usually have distinct strengths and weaknesses. However, it's more common for people to own mathematics as a definite strength than verbal ability. within the SET sample employed in many studies of the profoundly gifted, 58% of people have a distinctly higher ability in mathematics than in verbal reasoning (23% with verbal beyond math; 19% with equally high abilities in verbal and math). So, if you are taking 4 representative profoundly gifted students, it's likely 3 have extremely high abilities in math but only 2 would have high abilities in verbal (on average).
Therefore, A top scorer in math might not be mathematically intelligent in day to day accounts.
#SPJ1