essay on what i have done for for the society in the pandemic
Answers
Answer:
I have been staying at home and spending my time with my family. It's was was a very simple day as I didn't go out. Me and my family have been spending our time together then before. It was really fun because I love to spending my time with my family. We do everything together.
I play games with my friends only and it was very fun but it was kind of sad because we couldn't meet each other as our parents didn't let us go out. To be honest I miss the old times when there is no covid-19. I used to hate to go to school, but I miss the school right now.
I miss those times when me and my friends play outside together and hang out, it was very fun back then I hope the pandemic thing finish so I can go on a holiday and spend my time like last last years.
Explanation:
I recommend you to write how you feel. I didn't write how I feel here, but this is how I imagine how some people might be feeling. Hope this help you
Answer:
The question of how to reopen our societies in the wake of the pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus poses special questions for social researchers, beyond those of the immediate and difficult task at hand. For scholars, the question is not only, what is society to become after the Covid-19 pandemic? But how do the social conditions exposed, exacerbated, and created by the novel coronavirus demand that we substantively rethink our ideas of society and, therefore, some of the prevailing assumptions, methods, and theories of social science?
The Covid-19 crisis has disrupted the normal practice of economy and governance, and scientific expertise. In recent weeks we have experienced a global economic crisis that was unexpected; because the speed and scope of this downturn lacks historical precedent, its impact cannot be readily modeled using the standard social science methods. In the realm of political economy, we see market transitions without historical precedent, such that they become impossible to model reliably, even as new and unexpected informal economies are emerging.
“The tested facts and hard evidence emerging out of scholarship that were once relied upon as a ballast during times of social disorientation are now subject to ideological litmus tests or ignored.”
In the United States, the pandemic response is realigning (again) the respective roles and responsibilities of state and federal governments, against a backdrop of a reshuffled global political order, as scholars reckon with the decline of globalization (and the persistence of asymmetrical national interdependence1). The tested facts and hard evidence emerging out of scholarship that were once relied upon as a ballast during times of social disorientation are now subject to ideological litmus tests or ignored.
In addition to introducing new dynamics, the pandemic has confirmed what scholars have known about social inequality and compounded the intersecting forces of race, class, and gender on disparate life chances. The disproportionate, life-threatening impact of the novel coronavirus on Black communities across the United States, for example, is a symptom of the wider, deeper social pandemic of structural inequality. Social scientists have long known that socioeconomic opportunity, employment sector, incarceration and detention status, housing insecurity, and educational access have everything to do with health and wellbeing.
What should be our prevailing theory of society after pandemic intervention breaks what we thought we knew about economy, governance, and expertise, and confirms what we know, but failed to address about social inequality? How can we continue to invest in projects that sustain the description of gross inequality without offering prescriptions for change? Social research can provide theories, evidence, and viable alternatives to this impoverished status quo. As economist Darrick Hamilton notes in his brief interview about the future of social research on SSRC’s Covid-19 platform, “[t]here’s a need for a call to arms for us to apply our scholarship. There’s no impediment to drawing a link between research and policy beyond the fact that we don’t do it.”
Explanation:
hope it is helpful pls make me Brainlist