Question

Essay on why exercising the right to vote is a citizen's fundamental duty(word limit 300-400 words)

Answer 1

 Voting is a recognized manifestation of inclination for a contender for an administrative center or for a recommended determination of a matter. Voting mostly occurs in the background of an extensive countrywide or local election; yet, native and limited public elections can be just as precarious to singular contribution in administration. The Worldwide Pronouncement of Human Rights implemented consistently by the United Nations General Assembly in 1948, identifies the vital part that obvious and uncluttered elections perform in guaranteeing the fundamental right to partaking government. Every person has the privilege of one and the same right of entry to public service in their country. While the fortitude to vote is extensively accepted as a necessary human right, this privilege is not effusively obligatory for lots of persons across the globe. Constantly excluded clusters consist of the following:  
i.         Non- residents  
ii.         Adolescents 
iii.         Subgroups  
iv.          Those who perform offenses 
v.          Destitute   
vi.          Incapacitated individuals 
vii.         Numerous others who are deficient in access to the vote for an assortment of reasons such as penury, lack of education, terrorization, or bigoted election progressions. India has a disproportionate federal government, with chosen representatives at the national, administration and indigenous echelons. At the nation-wide rank, the top of administration, the prime minister is chosen by representatives of the Lok Sabha----- the subordinate house of the parliament of India.  The elections are piloted by the Election Commission of India. All representatives of the Lok Sabha, excluding two who can be chosen by the President of India, are straightforwardly chosen through general elections which come about every five years.  Elections in India are a replication of the system of power which is realized prevailing in the country. India is a statutory republic with a congressional system of government, and at the core of the system is a promise to command consistent, open and just election

Answer 2

Answer:

Explanation:

The term fundamental right is a technical one, for when certain human rights are written down in a Constitution and are protected by constitutional guarantees they are called fundamental rights. They are called fundamental rights in the sense that they are placed in the supreme or fundamental law of the land which has a supreme sanctity over all other law of the land.

Following the footsteps of the French Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen, 1789 and the American Declaration of Independence, 1776 and then the incorporation of a Bill of Right in the US Constitution in 1791 most of the democratic countries with written constitution are including a chapter for Bill of Rights or Fundamental Rights with special sanctity. Why is such a trend being followed invariably in written constitutions?

          The object of enumeration of fundamental rights in a constitution is not to make them unalterable in any way but main object is that they can not be taken away by ordinary process of law making. They are placed beyond the reach of the executive and the legislative to act in violation of them. The object of the incorporation of fundamental rights in the US Constitution was pointed out by Justice Jackson—

     “The very purpose of a Bill of Rights is to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy; to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One’s fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote, they depend on the outcome of no elections.”

          In Jibendra Kishor V. The Province of East Pakistan the Supreme Court of Pakistan held—

          “The very conception of a fundamental right is that it being a right guaranteed by the Constitution cannot be taken away by the law, and it is not only technically inartistic but a fraud on the citizens for the makers of a Constitution to say that a right is fundamental but that it may be taken away by the law.”

          The same view was reaffirmed by the Pakistan Supreme court in State V. Dosso. The Indian Supreme Court in Golak Nath V. State of Punjab4 held—

          “The declaration of the fundamental rights of the citizens are inalienable rights of the people     The Constitution enables an individual to oppose successfully the whole community and the state to claim his right.”

Rights and freedoms form the bedrock of democracy. No democracy can function successfully in the absence of some basic freedoms. Again, modern democratic government is a party government. The party winning majority in the election form, the government. But coming into power the government may turn itself into a dictatorial one violating the basic rights of people and oppressing the opposition. The aim of having a declaration of fundamental rights in the Constitution is to prevent such a possible danger. In other words, they provide a restraint on the power of the government so that it cannot interfere with the peoples’ basic rights according to its whims. When rights and freedoms are placed in the Constitution they become the part of the supreme law and the government cannot take them away except by constitution amending process which is always a rigid one. This is why insertion of a Bill of Rights in a written Constitution is considered to be one of the safeguards of democracy.