Essay:Personal Truth leads to Terrorism
Answers
Answer:
Nature’s disasters and their aftermath have engendered fear and fascination in human
minds for thousands of years. They have shaped the earth, the climate, and the makeup of
human civilization for perhaps even longer. From the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79AD to
the devastation wrought by Cyclone Nargis on Myanmar in 2008, these events and others have
continually reminded us of nature’s capricious temperament. As societies have expanded, they
have adapted in an attempt to mitigate the effects of these devastating events, but all too often the
propensity of disasters to overwhelm human adaptations has proved both humbling and daunting.
The aftermath of a disaster is a particularly trying time for any government. A society vests
much of its security within its government’s ability to protect; thus, the effectiveness and
efficiency of disaster preparedness and recovery measures are crucial to maintaining a
government’s legitimacy. As a result, natural disasters as possible catalysts of terrorism have
serious implications for both national security and disaster policy both locally and regionally.
The aim of this dissertation is to explore and illuminate the relationship between natural disasters
and terrorism. The research will examine and test this link across many dimensions of both
disasters and terrorism. Furthermore, these natural events introduce essentially random
exogenous shocks which could affect terrorism. An added benefit of this randomness is that it
can be used as an instrument to assess causal effects of terrorism on other factors. In particular,
we utilize this fact to investigate and clarify causal links between terrorism, female labor force
participation, and larger gender disparities in the labor market.
Explanation:
HOPE SO IT HELPS YOU ALSO MARK BRAINLIEST IF U FOUND IT HELPFULL
Answer:
errorism is often construed as a well-thought-out, extreme form of violence to perceived injustices. The after effects of terrorism are usually reported without understanding the underlying psychological and social determinants of the terrorist act. Since ‘9/11’ Pakistan has been at the epicentre of both terrorism and the war against it. This special paper helps to explain the psychosocial perspective of terrorism in Pakistan that leads to violent radicalisation. It identifies the terrorist acts in the background of Pakistan's history, current geopolitical and social scenario. The findings may also act as a guide on addressing this core issue.
Most nations are unable to reach a consensus on a legally binding definition of ‘terrorism.’ The term seems emotionally charged and, as such, governments have been devising their own definitions. So far the United Nations has been unable to devise an internationally agreed-upon definition of terrorism. Terrorism is suggested to be ‘the use of intimidation or fear for advancement of political objectives’ (Kruglanski & Fishman, 2006). Since the ‘9/11’ incident, Muslim countries in particular feel emotionally threatened with the word terrorism and perceive it as synonymous with the acts of terror carried out by so-called Muslim extremist groups. This is further complemented in the media by the unjust linking of such horrendous terror attacks to Islamic Jihad.
Terrorism has brought an enormous burden on South Asian countries through the adverse impacts on their social, economic, political and physical infrastructure. Pakistan has suffered particularly excessively from the social, economic and human costs due to terrorism (Daraz et al, 2012). Surprisingly, Pakistan is portrayed as being on the front line in the international war against terrorism and at the same time has been wrongly labelled as a sponsor of international terrorism. Terrorism in Pakistan is a multidimensional phenomenon and, among many precipitating factors, the psychosocial factors play an important role. This paper attempts to address what we believe are significant psychosocial determinants to terrorism in Pakistan.
Explanation: