Question

Evidence shows that in practice many democracies did not fulfil the expectation of producing economic development in the country. Validate the statement with the help of relevant example.

Answer 1

The economic development of countries is comprised of many factors i.e. the population of the country, the support from the other countries, etc.

Explanation:

• It is thought that democracy is a vital key to better economic development.

• Although, it depends on the situation.

• For example, the countries of Asia like Pakistan, India, and China became independent at the same time but China has excelled in every country in terms of economic development, it is not even a democratic state.

• Whereas India is largest democratic country in the world but it is still way far behind Chins in economic development.

Answer 2

$\Large{\textbf{\underline{\underline{Points\;are}}}}$

1. In the event that we consider all democratic rule government and all autocracies for the fifty years somewhere in the range of 1950 and 2000 fascisms have somewhat higher pace of financial development.

2. Financial improvement relies upon a few components - Country populace size, worldwide circumstance, collaboration from different nations, monetary needs received by the nation.

3. Anyway the distinction in the paces of financial advancement between less created nations with autocracies and democratic rule system is irrelevant.

4. In general it can't be said that democratic rule system is an assurance of financial turn of events. Be that as it may, we can expect democratic rule government not to linger behind fascisms in this regards.

5. With such a huge distinction in the paces of financial development between nations under tyranny and democratic rule system it is smarter to lean toward vote based system as it has a few other positive results.

For instance - North Korea has higher pace of financial development than India.