History, asked by simranchawla295, 1 year ago

examine the circumstances in which the muslim league and the congress drifted away from nationlist struggle to fight communal struggles​

Answers

Answered by techtro
0

Answer:

The Indian National Congress accused the Muslim League, while the Muslim League accused the Congress. It can't be said that there is no fact in these clashing cases as the two gatherings were dependable somewhat. Both had would not bargain, tenaciously sticking to their requests, which raised the possibility of a common war avoidable just by parcel, however the primary offender—'the outsider' as Gandhi called them, were the British. The Partition was their doing. It was their steady incitements that raised pressures between the two gatherings, and the unavoidable occurred.

Explanation:

That infamous radical procedure—'partition and standard'— was by and by in real life. The British, as a major aspect of that methodology, seemed to support the Hindus now and then, while different occasions they seemed to support the Muslims. However, in all actuality, they just at any point thought about their very own advantages. So they gave them territories through segment, rather than freedom, with the power left in the hands of manikin governments that would defend their interests. Congress had for some time thought about all out autonomy yet in the long run made due with a course of action dependent on the revision of the Government of India Act, 1935, which means India would in any case be a piece of the British Commonwealth. The Muslim League, then again, couldn't have cared less about freedom.

All it needed was Pakistan, so it had no issue at all with a domain status. So these archrivals, who had never agreed about anything, at long last found a typical reason: India-Pakistan split, albeit only two days into 'freedom,' the two gatherings were stunned to see the Radcliffe Line, the limit that separated India and Pakistan. Be that as it may, by then it was past the point of no return. The subcontinent would never truly recoup from the bleeding outcome of the Partition.

Answered by indiabrainly
0

Answer:

Explanation:

Answer - India was mostly a Hindu majority state, and the Muslims wanted their very own state because their faith, culture and ideas were completely different from that of the Hindus and also the Congress was comprised of mainly Hindus.

They did not want to be discriminated on instead wanted to be separated.

Similar questions