Question

examine the relationship between archaeology, legends and epic with specific reference to purana qila

Answer 1

A few people put a significant connection between archaic exploration, legends, and epic with explicit reference to Purana Qila  

Explanation:

• The uncovering at the Purana Qila in Delhi has uncovered remaining parts of a pre-Mauryan time settlement from the sixth fourth century BCE.  
• Yet, archeologists actually haven't found any proof of Indraprastha, the famous city of the Mahabharata, referenced in epic.  

• "During the 1950s, classicist BB Lal had completed unearthings at all the destinations referenced in the Mahabharata.  
• At practically all the spots, one being Hastinapur (in advanced Uttar Pradesh), he had discovered a sort of ceramics, recognized as painted dark product (PGW), in the least degree of the dirt," says Vasant Kumar Swarnkar, overseeing classicist, Chandigarh Circle, Archeological Survey Of India (ASI).  
• Scientifically measuring of the discoveries indicated that the PGW culture dated back to 1200-800 BCE.  
• As Lal concedes, in any case, just finding a PGW culture at the destinations referenced in the epic, doesn't consequently demonstrate the trustworthiness of the story.  

• It essentially shows these locales were socially interconnected.  

• "As per the Puranas, the descendents of the Pandavas moved the capital from Hastinapur to Kaushambi due to a flood," says Lal. This at that point, as indicated by him, is the thing that ties the PGW culture with the Mahabharata.  

• Not every person is persuaded, be that as it may, with this understanding.  
• "Unearthings at the Purana Qila and different destinations associated with the Mahabharata story… " composes Singh, "where PGW has likewise been found – neither demonstrate nor refute the accuracy of the Mahabharata occasions. What they do show is that these locales were possessed from antiquated occasions" and that "individuals living here shared a comprehensively comparable kind of material culture."  

• The history specialist feels that the longing to discover a 'Mahabharata level' at this or some other site, isn't the most ideal method of moving toward archaic exploration.  
• "The Purana Qila is a significant site, regardless of whether it speaks to Indraprastha.  
• The Mahabharata is a vital book, regardless of whether it depends on some real recorded occurrence.